Bougainville Thrush Zoothera atrigena Scientific name definitions
- NT Near Threatened
- Names (17)
- Monotypic
Text last updated June 19, 2018
Sign in to see your badges
Species names in all available languages
Language | Common name |
---|---|
Catalan | griva de l'illa de Bougainville |
Dutch | Zoothera atrigena |
English | Bougainville Thrush |
English (United States) | Bougainville Thrush |
French | Grive de Bougainville |
French (France) | Grive de Bougainville |
German | Bougainville-Erddrossel |
Japanese | ブーゲンビルツグミ |
Norwegian | svartryggtrost |
Polish | drozdoń czarniawy |
Serbian | Drozd sa Solomonskih ostrva |
Slovak | drozd bougainvillský |
Spanish | Zorzal de Bouganinville |
Spanish (Spain) | Zorzal de Bouganinville |
Swedish | svartryggig trast (atrigena) |
Turkish | Bogenvil Ardıcı |
Ukrainian | Квічаль бугенвільський |
Zoothera atrigena Ripley & Hadden, 1982
Definitions
- ZOOTHERA
- atrigena
The Key to Scientific Names
Legend Overview
Field Identification
Systematics History
Until recently (1) considered conspecific with Z. talaseae, but differs in its slaty-black vs dark grey upperparts (ns[1]); heavy black scalloping on flanks (2); much-reduced wingbars (2); black vs pinkish legs (3); no vs broad white tail tips (1), although this difference not mentioned in original description (2) (ns[2]); lack of vague white markings (lores, cheek patch) on face with feebler white eyering (ns[1]); shorter wings (2) (at least 1); longer bill, tail and particularly tarsus (2) (allow 2). Monotypic.
Subspecies
Distribution
Bougainville I, in N Solomon Is.
Habitat
Montane forest at c. 1500 m. Forages also in taro (Colocasia/Alocasia) gardens within or adjacent to forest.
Movement
Diet and Foraging
Sounds and Vocal Behavior
Breeding
Conservation Status
Not globally threatened. Currently considered Near Threatened. Restricted-range species: confined to a single island in the Solomon group EBA. An enigmatic Zoothera, known only from the type locality, at 1500 m in one region in the Crown Prince Range (3, 4). There are very few records of this species, which is believed to have a very small population restricted to a single mountain range, but its numbers are thought to be stable as there appear to be no plausible threats within its known range. As with its congeners, however, it is a very secretive species and may be under-recorded.